Poem Analysis I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing Essay Example

Poem Analysis: I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing Paper Growing I chose to explicate the poem I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing by Walt Whitman. The beautiful thing about poetry Is that there can be various meanings depending on the reader. When I first read this poem I enjoyed It. However, I did not truly take pleasure in this poem until reading it over and over again. After rereading the poem time and time again, I discovered new and exciting details. This poem can be interpreted in many ways. If you are pessimistic you will envision the poem much differently than an optimistic reader would. This poem dramatists the inner issue of the speaker when it comes to self-sufficiency as he/she compares themselves to a tree. I have taken the time to pick apart each and every line of this poem In order to discover the true meaning that Walt Whitman wished to create. First and foremost, the title is of great significance. The title I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing, lets the reader know that the subject is one person. We also find out the setting of the poem, which is Louisiana. The word â€Å"growing† leads us to believe that the growing Is being done right in front of the subject. Growing literally means to spring up and develop to maturity. Since the poem has the word growing In It, I Immediately thought that act of growing may be pertinent to the subject In the poem. We will write a custom essay sample on Poem Analysis: I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Poem Analysis: I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Poem Analysis: I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In simple terms, I assumed that the poem was going to be about the observation of a tree in Louisiana. Furthermore, little is known about the speaker. We simply know that the speaker is one person, we are not sure about the sex or age. The first line of the poem is a restatement of the title. This Is followed by the line â€Å"All alone stood It and the moss hung down from the branches†. The speaker Is Informing us that the tree Is alone, meaning the tree is separated from others. We also discover that the tree branches are adorned with moss, which is a type of plant. The speaker has enabled the reader to picture this tree in their mind. In the next few lines we were reminded that the tree was situated in a space isolated from everything else. Whitman writes, â€Å"Without any companion, it grew there uttering Joyous leaves of dark green†. Not only do we know that moss covers the tree, but we now find out that the tree has dark green leaves. The word â€Å"uttering† In this line means that the tree Is making a statement or paving public expression. This refers to the leaves that dangle from the tree. The tree’s looks are further described as â€Å"rude, unbending and lusty. This line can easily be confused by the multiple definitions of these words. I believe that in terms of â€Å"rude†, Whitman means the rough and unfinished state of the tree. As far as â€Å"lusty’ goes, I think that Whitman is trying to say that the tree is full of strength. I find this line to be somewhat contradictory. However, I take each deflation Into account when creating ten Image AT ten tree In my mina We continue to learn many characteristics of the tree. At this point, I think that the tree symbolizes self-reliance and independence. As the tree is surviving on it’s own, the speaker in the poem feels as if he/she is not qualified enough to do the same. The characteristics of the tree remind the speaker of himself/herself. I am prompted to think that this person is lacking confidence. The speaker then proceeds to wonder how the tree is able to expel such beauty all alone without the help of a friend or lover. We then surely find out that the speaker does not believe that they are able to o the same without the assistance and guidance of others. He or she may be dependent on others. I also begin to question the speakers reasoning for doubting himself/herself. There must have been an incidence that has led the speaker to think that he/she needs the help of friends. Through the next few lines the speaker breaks off a twig from the tree and winds some moss around it. I first thought that the speaker could be trying to destroy the tree. However, the way the speaker handles the twig leads me to think that he/she wants to be like the tree. â€Å"l have it placed in sight in my room†. He/she has the twig placed so that they can admire the twig and be reminded of the beautiful tree that is capable of so much. This twig may help the speaker to be more reliant on themselves. The twig may act as a positive influence for the speaker. The moss makes the twig more appealing, I think that it gives the twig character and backbone. â€Å"It is not needed to remind me as of my own dear friends, (for I believe lately I think of little else than of them)†. This line was difficult to explain and understand. The speaker is implying that there is not much to think of other than their friends. I question the loyalty and presence of the speaker’s friends. I wonder if the friends of the speaker do not treat him/her well or if they have betrayed him/her. There is definitely a reason why the speaker is thinking of his/her friends so much. The thought of the tree and it’s independence causes the speaker to be curious. I believe that the speaker is interested in how the tree can be skilled enough to accomplish so much while being unaccompanied. â€Å"–it makes me think of manly love† writes Whitman about the tree. In this line I think Whitman is addressing the issue of love. The surprising capabilities of the tree prompt him to think of the strong affection possessed by a man. I believe that Whitman is comparing the unexpected happenings of love to the abilities of the tree and life itself. Both of these ideas present an obstacle in the eyes of the speaker. â€Å".. And thought the live oak glistens there in Louisiana, solitary, in a wide flat space†. The word â€Å"glistens† in this line grabs my attention. The speaker is trying to dramatist the magnificence that he/she has found in the tree. Glisten is defined as a sparkling or lustrous reflection. This word ally stresses the beauty found in the tree. Solitary’ also accentuates the idea that the tree is abandoned and alone without companions. Whitman concludes the poem by writing â€Å"l know very well I could not†. This line is grounds for believing that the speaker lacks confidence. He/she has spent a great amount of time admiring and appreciating this oak tree in Louisiana. They have recognized the amazing capabilities that this tree possesses. However, there is a surprising twist to this poem. The speaker clearly announces that he/she is not adept to do the same. The speaker in the poem does not have faith in themselves. At first, I tongue Tanat ten immolation may De Jealousy towards ten tree, out ten way ten speaker shows respect towards the tree leads me to believe otherwise. It is amazing that a small thirteen line poem can verbalize so much. I Saw in Louisiana a Live Oak Growing does not appear to have any rhythmic pattern. I did notice that the poet repeats certain phrases and lines throughout the poem. For example, in lines 3 and 12, Whitman writes â€Å"uttering Joyous leaves†. After picking apart each line in this poem, I was able to gather a greater understanding of exactly what Walt Whitman was trying to depict.

Psychology Vs. Psychiatry Essays - Medical Ethics, Free Essays

Psychology Vs. Psychiatry Essays - Medical Ethics, Free Essays Psychology Vs. Psychiatry it's not compleated yet... Both psychiatry and psychology come from the Greek word, Psyche, which means Soul. In modern society, the word, Psyche means mind, or use of the mind. Even though psychiatry requires a medical degree, and psychology does not, they are almost identical because they deal with behavior, mental health and counseling. Webster's dictionary describes behavior in the psychological sense as , The actions or reactions of persons or things in response to external or internal stimuli., or in a more simple form ; The way in which one behaves. In both fields, and working with patients with behavior issues, both psychiatrists, and psychologists, work in very similar ways. They both provide the same type of treatment, by using verbal communication, in trying to figure out the problem. They ask the same questions, give the same suggestions, and so on. The difference is, is that psychiatrist do a little more detailed research on the subject, and or patient. Mental Health is also a large role in both psychiatry, and psychology. The main difference, is that mental health can be more serious when dealing with a psychiatrist. Mental illness is described as , The psychological state of someone who has emotional or behavioral problems , serious enough to require medical intervention. Mental illness is a term used in psychiatry and psychology, in only severe cases. Bibliography none

Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues Assignment

Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues - Assignment Example This suggests that a reality or practical approaches to solving problems usually shows limitations in seeking solutions to issues by applying a provided set of rules whereas philosophical or argumentative approaches to problem-solving normally show exploration of probable options and alternatives to seeking solutions to problems. This paper will, therefore, discuss the philosophical and practical approach for balancing issues such as individual rights and the public protection, use of reward and punishment in criminal justice, and techniques employed for weighing the use of immoral ways to accomplish desirable ends. Moreover, recommendations to employ ethics in decision making about the mentioned issues in criminal justice will be discussed. The most common problems arising within the community today are problems concerning individual rights as well as public protection, conduct codes for criminal justice, and morality. When solving problems regarding individual rights and public protection, the practical method would be based on set rules. For example, the rule that says, every man owns their own property and no other person has a right to his property but himself. This means that the work from his hands has lawfully gifted him with the property. A person who takes property that is not lawfully theirs is a thief and should be judged in accordance with the law. This is the case because the law guarantees the security of an individual’s property protection. Irrespective of their state, a thief is defenceless to accusations from the community as per the law, and so by a judgment of law, the thief is also protected from the public (Garland, 2006). A belief in fairness and justice is an important thing to present to a society. As there is no inequality of human rights on the pretext of using individual traits for example race, ethnicity, or gender. However, within a legal setting, these individual traits are considered serious issues regarding equality of human rights and have to be protected by the Government or Public. Despite the fact, that the independence declaration of 1776Â  underscored the conception of equality of all men regarding equality with some basic rights of life, happiness and liberty.

Compare and contrast analysis paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Compare and contrast analysis - Term Paper Example These three articles present three different cultural settings each with a particular cultural background ranging from human relations to animals and objects culture. Geertz (2005) "Notes on the Balinese cockfight", the author presents a community deeply rooted cultural observance despite the educational purpose of the cockfight function. As a way of raising school fees a role that government should have undertaken, this closely-knitted community comes together through a cultural event. In this article, symbolic interactionism theory plays out quite well. The community is united, and as theory suggests, they should be understood at their social level. In addition, ethnographic communication of the community need for school is clear. Through a cultural cockfight, the community communicates the social philosophy called verstehen that emphasizes on understanding the event from participants point of view (Geertz 2005). Certainly, Geertz knowledge on social theories in practice was put to test. In addition, the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) significantly applies to the cultural event. As this social theory suggests, the objects and animals use ought to be understood as part of the community communication and social network. Unlike Phillipsen and Hernandez articles, this article focuses on a cultural communicative ritual that is viewed noble and undertaken to pass crucial message. Besides, the article by Fordham Hernandez " A white Mothers muse" brings into light intercultural interaction theories. Certainly, a Mexican raising American-Mexican children present a sociological challenge. According to the social construction theory, the philosophy of typification bedevils the character of this article. As a product of a different culture in a totally new environment with a varied background of the children, she is prone to create cultural standards. However, the challenge of ethnocentrism would not allow the children to adopt their mothers culture. Perhaps,

Co-education Female Essay Example for Free

Co-education Female Essay The debatable issue on Co-education is continually progressing through the State and convincing parents and teachers that sex-separation will reveal a sign of improvement in student’s lives. In the United States, teamwork is a massive aspect in people’s lives where both girls and boys work together in order to achieve their goal , however, both articles provide informative proves that co-education could result in failure because of the different stereotypes in society. The debate mainly focuses on the separation of both sexes in school since â€Å"there is no extra cost. The debate also catches the reader’s attention by the different research that many scientists did in order to prove a fair result that will satisfy the parents and teachers. The separation of sexes in school could result in improvement of education and behavior with boys and girls. Based on Jennifer Medina’s article, teachers will face less problems if both sexes are separated since the boys will tend to focus more on learning than on girls, in addition, girls will tend to feel more comfortable participating in class. Co-education will also result in good teamwork especially in the outside community because both girls and boys will learn to communicate. However, from the boy’s point of view, they will tend to be more comfortable in expressing themselves and learn about â€Å"being a man† in their own bodies. In addition to those articles, the media will affect the parents and the teachers around the state because of highly known and educative people in society. For example, Leonard Sax who is a best seller author of Why Gender Matters and Michael Sax argues about single sex with a huge audience in order to prove their facts about the separation and the importance of it. In contrast, both sex educations could also result in improvement around the state and in schools because boys and girls will learn to communicate together and work hard as one community. In addition, many authors and scientist were seeking for evidence in order to prove that Co-education could be for the good of their community. For example, a research on Bronx’s Eagle school stated that both sexes’ classes tend to have higher test scores around the state and tend to receive high percentages in their community. Both sexes will also learn and appreciate that both sexes are important in everyone’s lives since they communicate and work together outside of the learning community. Researchers also proved that working together as both sexes will also result a sign improvement in teamwork because many girls tend to be left out in single-sex schools in teamwork projects. Comparatively, Co-Education and single education also have their problems in society because of their lack of certain teachings in schools. For example , a study showed that girls tend to be smarter than boys and tend to solve math and science faster and more accurate since there are different brains and each person have a different sign of knowledge and personality. However, since girls are smarter, they tend to ask for more detailed teachings and writing scripts since they will have more things to explain in their writing assignment. When in contrast, boys have to write about a simple sport or a job they seek for in order to prepare them for the future. Although, teachers who support single education tend to have other opinions toward their ways of teaching. For example, Mr. Napolitano claims that he is more comfortable in expressing his feelings and thoughts while teaching to single sex classrooms because the boys will tend to have the same situation. In addition he also shows a book called Patrol Boy in order to show boys that having a tattoo is not a material they should use in co-ed class. In conclusion, this debate tends to prove that single education will show more improvements since the media tend to support it and also the teachers. The reasons that parents should choose single education is because they will improve economically and also their students will face less behavior problems and more school focused. However, co-ed schools tend to have higher scores and will teach the students to work together in order to improve their speech especially outside in society since they will be working together as one team. Both articles prove that both educations will result in bonding together as students and as teachers in this society because at the end of this debate both classrooms will be teaching and learning in the states.

Relationships Essay -- essays research papers

How have three texts you have studied enhanced your understanding of relationships? Refer to Maestro and two other texts of your choosing? Relationships are a complex part of today’s society and affect all areas. All relationships are different, and they influence the decisions made by people and others around them. The three texts ‘Maestro’ by Peter Goldsworthy, ‘Dead Poets Society’ directed by Peter Weir and ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ by Michelle Magorian all enhance the understanding of relationships. These three texts, all show various types of relationships, are all presented in various ways. The main relationship presented in ‘Maestro’ involves the unlikely friendship developed between a teacher (Keller) and his student (Paul). The main relationship in ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ is rather similar and involves the relationship between an elderly man (Tom) and an evacuee he was forced to take on- a young boy (Willie). Finally the main relationship exposed in ‘Dead Poets Society’ is between a teacher (John Keating) and his pupils including Neil and Todd. All of these relationships in these texts enhance ones understanding of relationships by techniques used. ‘Maestro’s’ unique technique, is not only the use of first person, but how the whole story is a combination of flashbacks and memories by the narrator Paul of when ‘he was only a child’. From this perspective, the narrator reflects back on this enchanted period of childhood and adolescence. His relationship with Keller is very cold at first, and we know this is misleading through the first line when Paul quotes ‘First Impressions? Misleading, of course. As always’. The first chapter is about Paul and Keller, and how they do not get along. Through the first line, we know that this is a false impression of their relationship and that it will improve. This line that Paul recites, generally describes all relationships. They are false on first impressions, as the person is not familiar to you. ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ has a traditional layout, with chronological chapters, and written in third person. When Tom first meets Willie, it is an awkward experience for Tom, and a frightening experience for Willie as to Willie Mr Tom ‘was a towering giant with skin like coarse, wrinkled brown paper and a voice like thunder’. However as one continues through the book it is recognized that William Beech and his relationship with Mr.... ...es, moreover, he truly believes that he is not able to write poetry. However, John Keating neither gives him an "F" nor lets him sit down however makes Todd believe in himself. He says: "Mr. Anderson thinks that everything inside of him is worthless and embarrassing, isn't that right Todd, isn't that your worst fear? Well, I think you're wrong, I think you have something inside of you that is worth a great deal." Saying this was enough to make Todd believe that he is just as any other students of his class is able to write a poem. When individuals experience success, they grow in self-confidence and as their self-esteem grows, they will feel more comfortable to face new challenges. Weir tries to convey that sometimes to achieve that confidence, a mentor is required, someone who can bring you up when you are down. The novels ‘Maestro’ by Peter Goldsworthy, ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’ by Michelle Magorian and ‘Dead Poets Society’ directed by Peter Weir all convey various messages to enhance the understanding of relationships. Through the use of various techniques such as characterization, themes, and music, these texts emphasize the importance and value of relationships.

Immune System and Blood Platelets A.

Which of the following are concerned with the prevention of bacterial Infections In different parts of the human body? Alimentary canal Respiratory tract Blood A. Digestive enzymes hair white blood cells B. Mucus cilia red blood cells acid blood platelets D. Bile salts Directions: Questions 48 and 49 refer to the graph below which shows the changes In the concentration of antibodies In the blood of a person with time: 48. The increase in the antibody concentration on day 7 might be caused by A. Excessive bleeding B. The entry of bacteria C. Recovery from a disease D. The intake of a large amount of antibiotics 49. The antibody concentration increased rapidly on day 21 because the person A. Developed a fever. B. Received a vaccination. C. Was Infected by the same type of antigen. D. Produced a large number of phagocytes. 32. Which of the following components of the blood can destroy bacteria that have entered the body? (1) antibodies (2) phagocytes (3) blood platelets A. (1) and (2) o nly B. (1) and (3) only C. (2) and (3) onlyD. (2) and (3) 46. Which of the following are examples of artificial immunity? (1) Injection of vaccine into the body (2) Injection of antibodies into the body (3) Injection of antibiotics into the body A. (1) only B. (1) and (2) only 34. In the alimentary canal, bacteria in food are mainly killed by A. Saliva. B. Mucus. C. Gastric Juice D. Pancreatic Juice Directions: Questions 49 and 50 refer to the graphs below, which show the changes in the antibody level in the blood as a result of two methods of inducing immunity in humans: 49.Substance P can be (1) bacteria. (2) antigens. (3) antibodies. B. (3) only C. (1) and (2) only D. (2) and (3) only 50. What is the advantage of method 2 over method 1 in inducing immunity? A. The B. The immunity can develop faster. C. It can stimulate the white blood cells to produce more antibodies. D. The body can become immune against a wider range of diseases. 01 18. Which of the following statements about a ntibodies is correct? A. They act on specific antigens. B. They are produced by phagocytes. C. They develop a memory for antigensD. They can replicate rapidly during infection. 60. Which of the following structures produce secretions that can protect the body from infection? (1) skin (2) stomach (3) trachea 02 42. A person was infected by the same kind of pathogen twice within a month. Assuming the quantity of pathogen for both infections was the same, which of the following graphs correctly shows the change in the pathogen level in the person's blood?